Weekender™ Chrono Oversized is rated out of 5 by 8.
Rated 5 out of 5 by mjpatterson352 from My second of three Weekenders! I bought my first classic Weekender almost four years ago, and it's still going strong on the original battery. I live in Florida, and the heat, humidity, and sweat can ruin a watchband in no time. Being able to easily switch out the band is a huge plus! My Weekender is truly my weekend watch. Then I saw the chronograph version with the blue face and leather strap and bought it to wear to work, then found it in another version - distressed brass - at Kohl's. Timex made a great watch even better!
Date published: 2016-04-01
Rated 0 out of 5 by ZachM from Great watch, but little bulky Great watch! Reliable, looks classy, and absolutely has a premium feel. The off-white face is paired nicely with the blue leather strap. My only complaint is that because I have a smaller wrist (men), the watch is a little bulky and the strap extends past the second loop prompting readjustment. I'd prefer if the watch were the thickness of their flagship watches, but it's a matter of preference.
Date published: 2016-05-16
Rated 4 out of 5 by stscracker from Not to shabby For the money, it's a phenomenal watch. Looks almost as great as some of my watches that are closer to the grand marker, but I don't have to fret over knocking this one around a little. It's an outstanding, classy looking play watch I can wear all day every day. Only complaint is the case height is a bit tall and the case being made from brass, but then I did only pay 60 bucks for it. If it remedied those issues it would have got five stars. All in all, I'm surprisingly pleased with the purchase and am looking at more of there stuff to wear.
Date published: 2016-06-03
Rated 5 out of 5 by braden.rich from Weekender™ Chrono Oversized I bought Weekender™ Chrono Oversized... Great looking....! Great Price
Date published: 2016-02-15
Rated 4 out of 5 by AACrocker from Great Watch! Good watch. Comfortable, conservative yet stylishly simple.
Date published: 2016-12-07
Rated 5 out of 5 by iheartz00y0r from Perfect Casual/office watch As far as inexpensive watches are concerned, Timex has it down to a science. This piece is beautiful. The deep blue face adds a perfect pop of color when worn with a dull outfit and seems to compliment any other color/pattern perfectly. The Indiglo feature and subtle glow-in-the-dark accent on the minute and hour hands are great. The chronograph function is easy to operate, and I've actually found myself using it much more than I imagined I would. When not in use, the chronograph hands line up precisely with their resting mark, which has been an issue for me with other chronos I've owned. It's about 6 mm larger in diameter than the classic Weekender, and much thicker, but not nearly to the point of looking comical like many of the watches that are popular today. The tan leather strap wasn't my favorite at first, but as with all genuine leather products, after a few months of wear, it has aged to a surprisingly beautiful patina and looks better every day. The strap has more of a walnut/mahogany shade as of now. It also looks and fits great with many of the nylon Weekender straps I own. This watch keeps time perfectly, I've owned it for 6 months now and it is still in sync with satellite time to the minute. I haven't had to adjust the time setting yet. I get complimented on this watch every time I wear it and most people are surprised to hear that its a Timex. If this piece becomes available through Timex again, or if you see it at a store don't hesitate to pick it up- you won't be disappointed.
Date published: 2015-07-26
Rated 3 out of 5 by Bucksmom95 from Disappointed in price point discrepancy! $20 difference between 2 colors of the same watch? Please.... I love the Timex brand and have been a fan for years. I'm a self confessed watch junkie. While I will purchase the Oversize Chrono, I'll pass on the $85 price tag for the color I want.
Date published: 2016-10-10
Rated 3 out of 5 by Dina from Dissapointed The leather strap came scuffed up. I was expecting better
Date published: 2016-12-06